On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:54:53 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sets up the following STFLE bits to enable the specified AP
> facilities for the guest VM:
> * STFLE.12: Enables the AP Query Configuration Information
> facility. The AP bus running in the guest uses
> the information returned from this instruction
> to configure AP adapters and domains for the
> guest machine.
> * STFLE.15: Enables the AP Special Command facility. The AP
> bus running in the guest sets the T bit in
> register 0 for the PQAP(TAPQ) instruction when
> scanning for AP devices if this facility is
> installed.
>
> These facilities are required in order for the AP bus running on
> the KVM guest to function properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 2 ++
> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h | 2 ++
> target/s390x/gen-features.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> index 31a4676..63f002c 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,10 @@ static const S390FeatDef s390_features[] = {
> FEAT_INIT("srs", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 9, "Sense-running-status facility"),
> FEAT_INIT("csske", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 10, "Conditional-SSKE facility"),
> FEAT_INIT("ctop", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 11, "Configuration-topology facility"),
> + FEAT_INIT("apqci", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 12, "Query Adjunct Processor Configuration facility"),
> FEAT_INIT("ipter", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 13, "IPTE-range facility"),
> FEAT_INIT("nonqks", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 14, "Nonquiescing key-setting facility"),
> + FEAT_INIT("apsc", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 15, "Adjunct Processor Special Command facility"),
Are there any interdependencies for those feature bits?
> FEAT_INIT("etf2", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 16, "Extended-translation facility 2"),
> FEAT_INIT("msa-base", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 17, "Message-security-assist facility (excluding subfunctions)"),
> FEAT_INIT("ldisp", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 18, "Long-displacement facility"),
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
> index 4b6d4e9..4e2589f 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ typedef enum {
> S390_FEAT_SENSE_RUNNING_STATUS,
> S390_FEAT_CONDITIONAL_SSKE,
> S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY,
> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO,
> S390_FEAT_IPTE_RANGE,
> S390_FEAT_NONQ_KEY_SETTING,
> + S390_FEAT_AP_SPECIAL_CMD,
> S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_TRANSLATION_2,
> S390_FEAT_MSA,
> S390_FEAT_LONG_DISPLACEMENT,
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 68e6c31..42914cf 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,10 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN11_GA1[] = {
> S390_FEAT_IPTE_RANGE,
> S390_FEAT_ACCESS_EXCEPTION_FS_INDICATION,
> S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_4,
> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO,
> + S390_FEAT_AP_SPECIAL_CMD,
As discussed for the kernel patch, this needs some thought. Do these
features need to be enabled conditionally?
> + /* FIXME when GISA support is available
> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL,*/
Looking forward to seeing some gisa patches :)
> };
>
> #define full_GEN11_GA2 EmptyFeat
