On 11/11/2017 02:44, Liran Alon wrote: > > Therefore I think you have found here a bug that was missed in the > review-chain from some reason and wasn't observed in tests... Will > investigate how tests didn't caught this. Sorry for this. Probably because the exception.pending case is very rare right now. It will become more common however if I can get rid of kvm_inject_page_fault_nested. This more or less also answers your question as to why this patch is related to the removal of kvm_inject_page_fault_nested. Thanks, Paolo
