On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:06:53AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 10:18, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Let swake_up() to return whether any of the waiters is waked up. One use
> > case of it would be:
> >
> > if (swait_active(wq)) {
> > swake_up(wq);
> > // do something when waiter is waked up
> > waked_up++;
> > }
> >
> > Logically it's possible that when reaching swake_up() the wait queue is
> > not active any more, and here doing something like waked_up++ would be
> > inaccurate. To correct it, we need an atomic version of it.
> >
> > With this patch, we can simply re-write it into:
> >
> > if (swake_up(wq)) {
> > // do something when waiter is waked up
> > waked_up++;
> > }
> >
> > After all we are checking swait_active() inside swake_up() too.
>
> Better subject:
>
> sched/swait: make swake_up() return whether there were any waiters
>
> I like this patch.
I'll see how PeterZ would like me to do next, or I can drop this patch
and send another clean up which is part of patch 2. Thanks for the
positive feedback and commenting. :-)
--
Peter Xu
