On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:08:25PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > Let's remove kvm_its_unmap_device and use kvm_its_free_device > as both functions are identical. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v5: creation > --- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 14 ++------------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > index 8472417..2f3c3a1 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c > @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, > } > > /* Requires the its_lock to be held. */ > -static void vgic_its_unmap_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *device) > +static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *device) > { > struct its_ite *ite, *temp; > > @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapd(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, > * by removing the mapping and re-establishing it. > */ > if (device) > - vgic_its_unmap_device(kvm, device); > + vgic_its_free_device(kvm, device); > > /* > * The spec does not say whether unmapping a not-mapped device > @@ -1623,16 +1623,6 @@ static int vgic_its_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type) > return vgic_its_set_abi(its, NR_ITS_ABIS - 1); > } > > -static void vgic_its_free_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *dev) > -{ > - struct its_ite *ite, *tmp; > - > - list_for_each_entry_safe(ite, tmp, &dev->itt_head, ite_list) > - its_free_ite(kvm, ite); > - list_del(&dev->dev_list); > - kfree(dev); > -} > - > static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev) > { > struct kvm *kvm = kvm_dev->kvm; > -- > 2.5.5 >