On 10/23/17 7:32 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:15:30AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: >> I am not sure if I am able to understand your feedback. The >> sev_platform_shutdown() is called unconditionally. > How's that: > > If sev_do_cmd() fails and sev_do_cmd(SEV_CMD_SHUTDOWN, ...) in > sev_platform_shutdown() fails, then the first ret from sev_do_cmd() is > gone. If both the command fails then we return status from the last command. IIRC, in my previous patches I was returning status from sev_do_cmd() instead of sev_platform_shutdown() but based on our previous communication I thought you asked to return the status from the last failed command. Did I miss understood ? -Brijesh
