On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:33:05PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:41:49AM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > Using the physical counter allows KVM to retain the offset between the
> > virtual and physical counter as long as it is actively running a VCPU.
> >
> > As soon as a VCPU is released, another thread is scheduled or we start
> > running userspace applications, we reset the offset to 0, so that
> > userspace accessing the virtual timer can still read the cirtual counter
> > and get the same view of time as the kernel.
> >
> > This opens up potential improvements for KVM performance.
> >
> > VHE kernels or kernels continuing to use the virtual timer are
> > unaffected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 9 ++++-----
> > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 3 +--
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > index a652ce0..1859a1c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> > @@ -148,11 +148,10 @@ static inline void arch_timer_set_cntkctl(u32 cntkctl)
> >
> > static inline u64 arch_counter_get_cntpct(void)
> > {
> > - /*
> > - * AArch64 kernel and user space mandate the use of CNTVCT.
> > - */
> > - BUG();
> > - return 0;
> > + u64 cval;
> > + isb();
> > + asm volatile("mrs %0, cntpct_el0" : "=r" (cval));
> > + return cval;
> > }
> >
> > static inline u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > index fd4b7f6..9b3322a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -890,8 +890,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
> >
> > /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
> > if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) ||
> > - arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI)
> > + if (arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI)
>
> Please can you add an is_hyp_mode_available() check here, as you suggested
> last time?
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-July/521542.html
>
> Without it, I worry that the kernel timekeeper will be out of sync with the
> vDSO (which uses the virtual counter) on systems where CNTVOFF is
> initialised to a consistent non-zero offset and Linux was loaded at EL1.
>
Yes, will do.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
