From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I can use vmxcap tool to observe "EPTP Switching yes" even if EPT is not
exposed to L1.
EPT switching is advertised unconditionally since it is emulated, however,
it can be treated as an extended feature for EPT and it should not be
advertised if EPT itself is not exposed. This patch fixes it.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2:
* don't advertise "EPT VM Functions" in secondary processor-based VM-execution
controls if we don't actually support any VM Functions.
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index c460b0b..a6861ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2842,8 +2842,12 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
* Advertise EPTP switching unconditionally
* since we emulate it
*/
- vmx->nested.nested_vmx_vmfunc_controls =
- VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING;
+ if (enable_ept) {
+ vmx->nested.nested_vmx_vmfunc_controls =
+ VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING;
+ } else
+ vmx->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
+ ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC;
}
/*
--
2.7.4
