On 10/10/2017 21:16, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> - return 0; >> + return RET_PF_EMULATE; > A direct conversion would return RET_PF_RETRY, is this some > optimization? No, it's not (and should be a different patch anyway). Fixed. Paolo
On 10/10/2017 21:16, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> - return 0; >> + return RET_PF_EMULATE; > A direct conversion would return RET_PF_RETRY, is this some > optimization? No, it's not (and should be a different patch anyway). Fixed. Paolo
|