Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:14AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Being a major nitpick, I have to point out that the code is not >> > structured to support other iommus, and I think AMD has one that >> > can do this as well. >> >> (Joerg Cc:-ed) > > The AMD IOMMU does also have an interrupt remapping feature. But it is > currently unsupported in the Linux driver. When this is going to be > implemented I think we can go the same way as for device passthrough in > KVM. This was an Intel-only feature too and was later adapted to support > AMD IOMMU too. The Intel IOMMU is also interesting because it allows traffic from buggy ioapcis to be remapped safely in process context, adding a large margin of safety and flexibility to the existing irq migration and cpu hotunplug scenarios. Can we use the AMD IOMMU to achieve the same objective? I would really like to say from point X on AMD and Intel systems don't have to worry about irq migrations used caused by old buggy ioapic state machines, which I have previously confirmed in both AMD and Intel ioapics. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
