From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> The current code checks only for sme_active() when determining whether to perform the encryption attribute change. Include sev_active() in this check so that memory attribute changes can occur under SME and SEV. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c index dfb7d657cf43..3fe68483463c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c @@ -1781,8 +1781,8 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_dec(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc) unsigned long start; int ret; - /* Nothing to do if the SME is not active */ - if (!sme_active()) + /* Nothing to do if memory encryption is not active */ + if (!mem_encrypt_active()) return 0; /* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */ -- 2.9.5
