On 09/15/2017 07:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:52:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
As always, the devil is in the detail.
Ok, actually we can make this much simpler by using a static key. A
conceptual patch below - I only need to fix that crazy include hell I'm
stepping into with this.
In any case, we were talking about having a static branch already so
this fits the whole strategy.
thanks for the suggestion Boris, it will make patch much simpler.
I will try this out.
-Brijesh
