On 14/09/2017 00:22, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> has_sleeper*s*. Can fix when committing. > > So for regular waitqueues we have it singular, which is why I kept > that name -- albeit sleepers() being better suited, yes. I don't think > we want to rename it unless we rename all wq_has_sleeper() callers as > well. The typo is in patches 1 and 2. Fixed those! Paolo
