On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:49:04 +0200
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:40:11AM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > So what if we add an additional check like:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index fdf65a6..389db4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -4389,6 +4389,9 @@ static bool pci_slot_resetable(struct pci_slot *slot)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *dev;
> >
> > + if (slot->bus->self & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > list_for_each_entry(dev, &slot->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > if (!dev->slot || dev->slot != slot)
> > continue;
>
> Obviously I meant:
> if (slot->bus->self->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_BUS_RESET)
Much better, perhaps even incorporate the bus->self check for good
measure... is it possible to have a slot on a root bus? Taking
different approaches for bus vs slot reset should have been a giant red
flag that something is wrong. Thanks,
Alex
