On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 18:06:00 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looks like the "overflowing" range check is wrong. > > |=======b-------a=======| > > addr >= a || addr <= b Huh :) > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c > index c2e0ddc1356e..bcbd86621d01 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c > @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static inline int in_addr_range(u64 addr, u64 a, u64 b) > return (addr >= a) && (addr <= b); > else > /* "overflowing" interval */ > - return (addr <= a) && (addr >= b); > + return (addr >= a) || (addr <= b); > } > > #define end_of_range(bp_info) (bp_info->addr + bp_info->len - 1) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
