Re: [PATCH v3 37/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move kvm_vgic_destroy call around

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The way we call kvm_vgic_destroy is a bit bizarre. We call it
> *after* having freed the vcpus, which sort of defeats the point
> of cleaning up things before that point.
> 
> Let's move kvm_vgic_destroy towards the beginning of kvm_arch_destroy_vm,
> which seems more sensible.
> 

Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 7846a578db1a..ebab6c29e3be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
> +
>  	free_percpu(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran);
>  	kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = NULL;
>  
> @@ -186,8 +188,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  			kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
>  		}
>  	}
> -
> -	kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux