On 17/08/2017 13:53, Yu Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/2017 7:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 12/08/2017 15:35, Yu Zhang wrote:
>>> index a98b88a..50107ae 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>>> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct
>>> x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>>> switch (mode) {
>>> case X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64:
>>> *linear = la;
>>> - if (is_noncanonical_address(la))
>>> + if (emul_is_noncanonical_address(la, ctxt))
>>> goto bad;
>>> *max_size = min_t(u64, ~0u, (1ull << 48) - la);
>> Oops, you missed one here. Probably best to use ctxt_virt_addr_bits and
>> then "inline" emul_is_noncanonical_address as "get_canonical(la,
>> va_bits) != la".
>
> Sorry, I just sent out the v2 patch set without noticing this reply. :-)
>
> The emul_is_noncanonical() is defined in x86.h so that no
> ctxt_virt_addr_bits needed in emulate.c, are you
> suggesting to use ctx_virt_addr_bits in this file each time before
> emul_is_noncanonical_address() is called?
No, only in this instance which uses "48" after the call to
emul_is_noncanonical_address.
Paolo
