On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:58:30AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>> Nested virtualizaion is in use only if all three conditions are met:
>> - The architecture supports nested virtualization.
>> - The kernel parameter is set.
>> - The userspace uses nested virtualiztion feature.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++++
>> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 00b0f97..7e9e6c8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -303,4 +303,15 @@ static inline int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline int init_nested_virt(void)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 6df0c7c..86d4b6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -387,5 +387,7 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
>> }
>>
>> int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf);
>> +int init_nested_virt(void);
>> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
>> index 79f38da..9a05c76 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
>> @@ -24,3 +24,20 @@ int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
>> {
>> return strtobool(buf, &nested_param);
>> }
>> +
>> +int init_nested_virt(void)
>> +{
>> + if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT))
>> + kvm_info("Nested virtualization is supported\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT)
>> + && test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT, vcpu->arch.features))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>
> after reading through a lot of your patches, I feel like vm_has_el2()
> would be a more elegant name, but it's not a strict requirement to
> change it.
I think it's a nice name. Let me think about it :)
>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> index 1c1c772..36aae3a 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> @@ -1478,6 +1478,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>> if (err)
>> goto out_err;
>>
>> + err = init_nested_virt();
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> err = init_subsystems();
>> if (err)
>> goto out_hyp;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
