Gleb Natapov wrote:
@@ -3174,10 +3174,11 @@ static void inject_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
kvm_x86_ops->set_nmi(vcpu);
}
- } else if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)) {
- if (kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
- kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu),
- false);
+ } else if (kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
+ int vec = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
+ if (vec != -1) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR"inject %d rip=%x\n", vec, kvm_rip_read(vcpu));
+ kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, vec, false);
kvm_x86_ops->set_irq(vcpu);
} }
Not sure if this is a win. Usually interrupts are allowed, so we'll
have to do both calculations. On vmx ->interrupt_allowed() reads the
vmcs, which is slow.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
