Re: [PATCH 0/17][REVIEW] Backport candidates for stable-0.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori wrote:

'git log origin/stable-0.10..origin/master' would have given you the same results ("all commits in master not present in stable").

You need to exclude commits from qemu/master too.

git log ^qemu/master origin/stable-0.10..origin/master

Gives the same result as what I did.

Yes, you're right. There's an assumption there that upstream commits find there way to upstream/stable and thence to qemu-kvm stable. An assumption that fortunately holds.

I like how things work out. It would have been pretty difficult for me to maintain a stable branch without the qemu upstream stable branch, as I could only realistically backport the stuff that goes through me.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux