Re: [PATCH v2] Shared memory device with interrupt support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cam Macdonell wrote:

If my understanding is correct both the VM's who wants to communicate would gives this path in the command line with one of them specifying as "server".

Exactly, the one with the "server" in the parameter list will wait for a connection before booting.

hm, we may be able to eliminate the server from the fast path, at the cost of some complexity.

When a guest connects to the server, the server creates an eventfd and passes using SCM_RIGHTS to all other connected guests. The server also passes the eventfds of currently connected guests to the new guest. From now on, the server does not participate in anything; when a quest wants to send an interrupt to one or more other guests, its qemu just writes to the eventfds() of the corresponding guests; their qemus will inject the interrupt, without any server involvement.

Now, anyone who has been paying attention will have their alarms going off at the word eventfd. And yes, if the host supports irqfd, the various qemus can associate those eventfds with an irq and pretty much forget about them. When a qemu triggers an irqfd, the interrupt will be injected directly without the target qemu's involvement.

I like it.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux