Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: nVMX: Add support for "VMWRITE to any supported field"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/07/2017 17:44, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2017 10:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2017 21:52, Jim Mattson wrote:
>>>> Allow VMWRITE in L1 to modify VM-exit information fields and report
>>>> this feature in L1's IA32_VMX_MISC MSR.
>>>>
>>>> Note that this feature is a prerequisite for kvm in L1 to use VMCS
>>>> shadowing, once that feature is available.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>> index b4cfdcfdc1c1..72f295510f76 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>> @@ -7467,14 +7447,7 @@ static int handle_vmwrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>              }
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>      field = kvm_register_readl(vcpu, (((vmx_instruction_info) >> 28) & 0xf));
>>>> -    if (vmcs_field_readonly(field)) {
>>>> -            nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
>>>> -                    VMXERR_VMWRITE_READ_ONLY_VMCS_COMPONENT);
>>>> -            return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>>>> -    }
>>>> -
>>>>      if (vmcs12_write_any(vcpu, field, field_value) < 0) {
>>>>              nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_UNSUPPORTED_VMCS_COMPONENT);
>>>>              return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>>>>
>>>
>>> vmcs_field_readonly is now unused.  With that removed,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Actually, no.  The error must be kept if the host has disabled the
>> feature with a KVM_SET_MSR ioctl for MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC.
> 
> Supporting both settings of this feature bit is a bit more complicated.

Right, you have to set up the vmwrite bitmap correctly.  But actually it should
be a couple lines of code and your patch would be much simpler, because you keep
the RW and RO field lists separate.

After your changes here, vmx_vmread_bitmap and vmx_vmwrite_bitmap have
always the same content.  Instead, it should be possible for the read
and write bitmap to point to the same address.  KVM_SET_MSR can do:

	if (enable_shadow_vmcs) {
		if (/* L1 has vmwrite to all fields */)
			vmcs_write64(VMWRITE_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmread_bitmap));
		else
			vmcs_write64(VMWRITE_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmwrite_bitmap));
	}

And in vmx_vcpu_setup,

-	vmcs_write64(VMWRITE_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmwrite_bitmap));
+	vmcs_write64(VMWRITE_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmread_bitmap));

so that the default is to expose the feature.

Paolo

>> The upside is that patch 4 is good as is. :)
> 
> Not quite, but close.
> 
>> Also:
>>
>>>>
>>>> +    /*
>>>> +     * We can emulate "VMWRITE to any supported field," even if
>>>> +     * the hardware doesn't support it.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    vmx->nested.nested_vmx_misc_low |=
>>>> +            MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC_VMWRITE_SHADOW_RO_FIELDS;
>>>> +
>>
>> There is already a "vmx->nested.nested_vmx_misc_low |= " statement a
>> couple lines above.  Please generalize the comment to something like "We
>> can always emulate these features, even if the hardware doesn't support
>> them".
>>
>> Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux