On 22/06/2017 09:46, Stefan Raspl wrote: > OK, so that sounds like we're in agreement that this is a useful > feature. The question is whether to do it via an interactive command > or a command line switch, or both. > I guess my vote would be to do both, i.e. add > '--debugfs-include-past' as a new command line switch to the patch, > but leave 't' in place. I would prefer to add only the new option for now. Paolo
