Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: improve NMI window singlestep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15/06/2017 13:20, Ladi Prosek wrote:
> NMI window singlestep kind of works with these patches because it's meant
> only for short sequences (I believe that the original intention was to
> step over an IRET but I doubt it's that simple anymore)

Yes, it was meant to step over an IRET or an interrupt shadow.

One extra case that may cause NMI singlestep these days is GIF=0, but 
that is also solved easily:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d1efe2c62b3f..15a2f7f8e539 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -4622,6 +4622,9 @@ static void enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & (HF_NMI_MASK | HF_IRET_MASK))
 	    == HF_NMI_MASK)
 		return; /* IRET will cause a vm exit */
+	if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & (HF_NMI_MASK | HF_GIF_MASK))
+	    == HF_NMI_MASK)
+		return; /* STGI will cause a vm exit */

so you could include this change in your series.

Paolo

> so we can get
> away with half-butting it. In particular, it's unlikely that the guest
> would set the TRAP flag while the NMI window is closed. Properly handling
> KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP would likely involve intercepting PUSHF & POPF,
> clearing the TRAP flag from the stack on interrupt entry, and possibly more.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux