Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:54:28 +0200
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx, dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx, josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20170606125357.GB3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20170605220919.GA27820@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1496700591-30177-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170606110915.g7zlzoj5iidhpp7g@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <a3934e5f-60ca-0205-d7c0-47921b051dc1@redhat.com> <20170606125357.GB3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So the only part of this patch that is needed is the changes to the
> comments, right?  ;-)

Right, although I would suggest putting that requirement (the balanced
lock vs unlock) somewhere as well.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

References:
- [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
  - From: Paul E. McKenney
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
  - From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Add ICV_BPR0_EL1 handler
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Add ICV_BPR0_EL1 handler
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from both process and interrupt context
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]