Re: [RFC + PATCHES] Work to get KVM autotest upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patches look good, but I haven't tested them yet to make sure
they leave everything at a functional state (will test them and let
you know).

I have a somewhat related question: how is KVM-Autotest development
going to proceed after the upstream merge? Currently I have
comfortable access to our repository at TLV, and on good days I push
as many as 20 patches per day. Should I submit all patches to the
Autotest mailing list after the merge, or are we going to work with
pull requests, or some other way? Will we work with git or svn?

Thanks,
Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <mrodrigu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:37:40 PM (GMT+0200) Auto-Detected
Subject: [RFC + PATCHES] Work to get KVM autotest upstream

These are the patches I have so far related to the work to get kvm
autotest in shape for upstream merge. Please note that once the patches
are applied, the kvm_runtest_2 directory should be placed on a fresh svn
trunk checkout to work, so there's a little bit of tweaking to get them
working.

That said, this haven't had enough testing. I am posting them here only
if someone wants to take a look at them.

Cheers,
-- 
Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Software Engineer (QE)
Red Hat - Emerging Technologies
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux