On 12.05.2017 12:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Since the ppc64 implementation is currently only a defunc dummy
> implementation, let's replace it by the generic one.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/ppc64/asm/spinlock.h | 9 ++-------
> lib/ppc64/spinlock.c | 18 ------------------
> powerpc/Makefile.ppc64 | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 lib/ppc64/spinlock.c
>
> diff --git a/lib/ppc64/asm/spinlock.h b/lib/ppc64/asm/spinlock.h
> index 002cdb1..da1d9d0 100644
> --- a/lib/ppc64/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/lib/ppc64/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@
> +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h>
In case you respin this series: I think it would be nicer to put the
#include within the header guards below.
> #ifndef _ASMPPC64_SPINLOCK_H_
> #define _ASMPPC64_SPINLOCK_H_
>
> -struct spinlock {
> - int v;
> -};
> -
> -extern void spin_lock(struct spinlock *lock);
> -extern void spin_unlock(struct spinlock *lock);
> -
> #endif /* _ASMPPC64_SPINLOCK_H_ */
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
