On 08/05/2017 09:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 08/05/2017 05:31, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 05:22:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 06/05/2017 12:02, Paul Mackerras wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29/04/2017 02:25, Paul Mackerras wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like this to go into 4.12. I know this pull request is >>>>>> somewhat late, but that is mostly because I had 3 weeks vacation this >>>>>> month. I have tested this on POWER9 and also tested that it doesn't >>>>>> break other platforms such as POWER8. >>>>> >>>>> No problem, I'm a bit late too and this is linux-next anyway. I'll pull >>>>> it next Tuesday because I have a public holiday. >>>> >>>> I haven't seen it go into kvm/next yet. Is there a problem with it, >>>> or have you just not got up to it yet, or did you do it and I missed >>>> it? >>> >>> It was in kvm/queue only, now it's there. >> >> I'm still not seeing it. Did you forget to push it out or something? > > Ok, connected my brain and pulled now. Sorry for the inconvenience. I'm un-pulling this, because it creates merge conflicts with Linus's tree due to an unwanted rebase (?) by either you or Michael. In particular this commit commit 8bf8f2e8c786f37991bd27332c75edcc524d2232 Author: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Apr 19 05:12:16 2017 +1000 powerpc/64s: Revert setting of LPCR[LPES] on POWER9 is already present in Linus's tree with a different hash: commit 8d1b48ef580097e111c2644e6fc6041b9784d218 Author: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Apr 19 05:12:16 2017 +1000 powerpc/64s: Revert setting of LPCR[LPES] on POWER9 and causes conflicts with this subsequent commit: commit 700b7eadd5625d22b8235fb21259b3d7d564c000 Author: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Apr 19 05:12:17 2017 +1000 powerpc/64s: Power9 has no LPCR[VRMASD] field so don't set it I'll take care of sending a separate pull request to Linus, but please avoid doing this kind of cherry-pick in the future. Paolo >> I don't know if you saw the email exchange between Michael Ellerman >> and Linus. Michael put into his tree a commit that moves the >> declaration of powerpc_debugfs_root from asm/debug.h to asm/debugfs.h, >> and that commit is now in Linus' tree. Since my tree adds a use of >> powerpc_debugfs_root, it is necessary when merging my tree into Linus' >> to add #include <asm/debugfs.h> to arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c. I >> can't do that in my tree because asm/debugfs.h doesn't exist there. > > Yes, I noted that and will remind Linus today when sending the pull request.