Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/05/2017 05:36, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Great.
> 
> As there is no conflict between these two patchsets except dirty
> ring pages takes benefit from write-protect-all, i think they
> can be developed and iterated independently, right?

I can certainly start reviewing this one.

Paolo

> Or you prefer to merge dirty ring pages first then review the
> new version of this patchset later?



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux