2017-04-26 10:40+0200, David Hildenbrand:
> On 25.04.2017 21:59, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> 2017-04-25 21:03+0200, David Hildenbrand:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ void vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
>>> void kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update(struct kvm *kvm);
>>> void kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm);
>>> +bool kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm);
>>
>> (A nitpick: it might be useful even without __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC so weak
>> linking would probably be cleaner for a slow path.)
>>
>>> #else
>>> static inline void kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> {
>>> @@ -511,6 +512,10 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> static inline void kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> +static bool kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> +{
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>> #endif
>>>
>
> Makes sense, shall I resend or can you fix that up when applying?
Please send a v2, it's going to be automatically compile-tested on all
arches that way. :)
