Andreas Tanz wrote:
Craig Metz wrote:
In message <49D396AB.6090304@xxxxxxxxxx>, you write:
Via engineers have contacted me and confirmed that this is a problem in
the processor.
Is there a known-fixed CPU revision?
Is there a way to identify working vs. non-working chips, either from IC
stamp or from /proc/cpuinfo? (Bonus: is it possible to put a check and an error
into the kvm-intel kernel model?)
I have no idea. Please contact Via for this information.
Hi,
I've read an EMail from VIA, telling that the Nano must be at least stepping 3.
Prior steppings have a buggy vt implementation...
(Damn! I have stepping 2 :-I )
Can you send your /proc/cpuinfo, I'll try to blacklist it.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
