On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:54:33PM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > Apparently, I don't have experience to induce non-fatal error, device > error is more of a chance related with the environment(temperature, > humidity, etc) as I understand. I'm not sure how to interpret this statement. I think what Alex is saying is simply that patches should include some justification. They make changes but what are they improving? For example: I tested device ABC in conditions DEF. Without a patch VM stops. With the patches applied VM recovers and proceeds to use the device normally. is one reasonable justification imho. -- MST
