Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH v4 13/22] KVM: arm64: ITS: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ITS_TABLES group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Xiaolong

On 30/03/2017 04:21, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> Hi, Eric
> 
> On 03/27, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27/03/2017 17:04, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> [auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
>>> [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc4 next-20170327]
>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Auger/vITS-save-restore/20170327-195443
>>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git next
>>> config: arm64-defconfig (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
>>> reproduce:
>>>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>         make.cross ARCH=arm64 
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c: In function 'vgic_its_has_attr':
>>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1766:33: error: 'its' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>       return vgic_its_table_restore(its);
>>
>> I think this is due to the fact the series is applied on KVM: arm/arm64:
>> Emulate the EL1 phys timer registers (kvmarm-for-4.11).
>>
>> Please apply it to (kvmarm/queue, kvmarm/next, kvm_next) KVM: arm/arm64:
>> vgic: Improve sync_hwstate performance  (255905e)
>> I also checked it compiles on 4.11-rc4.
> 
> Hmm, we did apply your series on top of kvarm/next, judging from the function
> code below, I can't see the 'its' declaration. 
> 
> static int vgic_its_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>                              struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> {
>         switch (attr->group) {
>         case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR:
>                 switch (attr->attr) {
>                 case KVM_VGIC_ITS_ADDR_TYPE:
>                         return 0;
>                 }
>                 break;
>         case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL:
>                 switch (attr->attr) {
>                 case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT:
>                         return 0;
>                 }
>                 break;
>         case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ITS_REGS: {
>                 u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
>                 u64 reg;
> 
>                 if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
>                         return -EFAULT;
> 
>                 return vgic_its_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
>         }
>         case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ITS_TABLES:
>                 if (attr->attr)
>                         return -EINVAL;
>                 return vgic_its_table_restore(its);
The above code shows that my series is not correctly applied since that
call to vgic_its_table_restore() should normally be in
vgic_its_set_attr() and not in vgic_its_has_attr() function
(virt/kvm/arm/vgic-its.c).

I pushed this series applied on top of up to date kvmarm/next at
https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/v4.11-rc3-its-mig-v4.

As noticed earlier, the series is applied on top of 255905e (KVM:
arm/arm64: vgic: Improve sync_hwstate performance)

Thanks

Eric


>         }
>         return -ENXIO;
> }
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
> 
>>
>> Please let me know if I got something wrong.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>>                                     ^~~
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1766:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>>>
>>> vim +/its +1766 arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>>>
>>>   1750			case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT:
>>>   1751				return 0;
>>>   1752			}
>>>   1753			break;
>>>   1754		case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ITS_REGS: {
>>>   1755			u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
>>>   1756			u64 reg;
>>>   1757	
>>>   1758			if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
>>>   1759				return -EFAULT;
>>>   1760	
>>>   1761			return vgic_its_attr_regs_access(dev, attr, &reg, true);
>>>   1762		}
>>>   1763		case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ITS_TABLES:
>>>   1764			if (attr->attr)
>>>   1765				return -EINVAL;
>>>> 1766			return vgic_its_table_restore(its);
>>>   1767		}
>>>   1768		return -ENXIO;
>>>   1769	}
>>>   1770	
>>>   1771	static int vgic_its_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>>>   1772				     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>>>   1773	{
>>>   1774		struct vgic_its *its = dev->private;
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
>>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kbuild-all mailing list
>> kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux