Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Randomization also needs to leave thread_info at the beginning.  Can it do that?

Good point, and good question. No idea if the gcc extension can do,
but yes, it clearly needs a "you can't move this entry".

I assume it has some such capability already, because it's fairly
common to have that kind of "beginning of structure if fixed" due to
unions of structures anyway.

                 Linus



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux