On 03/28/2017 10:20 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:17:27 +0100 > Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Dong Jia Shi (16): >> s390: cio: introduce cio_cancel_halt_clear >> s390: cio: export more interfaces >> vfio: ccw: define device_api strings >> vfio: ccw: basic implementation for vfio_ccw driver >> vfio: ccw: introduce channel program interfaces >> vfio: ccw: register vfio_ccw to the mediated device framework >> vfio: ccw: introduce ccw_io_region >> vfio: ccw: handle ccw command request >> vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl >> vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl >> vfio: ccw: realize VFIO_DEVICE_G(S)ET_IRQ_INFO ioctls >> vfio: ccw: return I/O results asynchronously >> vfio: ccw: introduce a finite state machine >> docs: add documentation for vfio-ccw >> vfio: ccw: introduce support for ccw0 >> MAINTAINERS: Add vfio-ccw maintainers >> >> Documentation/s390/00-INDEX | 2 + >> Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.txt | 303 +++++++++++++ >> MAINTAINERS | 10 + >> arch/s390/Kconfig | 10 + >> arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h | 18 + >> arch/s390/include/asm/isc.h | 1 + >> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 8 + >> drivers/s390/cio/Makefile | 3 + >> drivers/s390/cio/cio.c | 69 +++ >> drivers/s390/cio/cio.h | 1 + >> drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c | 54 +-- >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 842 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 42 ++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 308 +++++++++++++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 207 +++++++++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 447 +++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 96 ++++ >> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 18 + >> include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h | 24 + >> 19 files changed, 2417 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.txt >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h >> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h >> > > Patch set looks good to me, and I think we should target it for the > next merge window (the interface looks fine, and we can iron out any > other things later.) > > Question: Which tree should this go through? Vfio or kvm/s390? Reading todays MAINTAINERS file this would go via Martins tree, after the last patch it will be separate. I can certainly carry that via the kvms390 tree, but Alex is certainly the final maintainer. So what about having a new repository under https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/ e.g. vfio.git that will then queue the patches for Alex to take?
