On 03/23/2017 10:42 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > In the next changes, we track the interrupts but we discard the timers as > that does not make sense. The next interrupt on a timer is predictable. > > But, the API request_percpu_irq does not allow to pass a flag, hence specifying > if the interrupt type is a timer. > > Solve this by passing a 'flags' parameter to the function and change all the > callers to pass IRQF_TIMER when the interrupt is a timer interrupt, zero > otherwise. > > For now, in order to prevent a misusage of this parameter, only the IRQF_TIMER > flag is a valid parameter to be passed to the request_percpu_irq function. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> # for arch/arc, arc_timer bits
