Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: fix nested EPT detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2017-03-22 18:09+0100, Ladi Prosek:
>> The nested_ept_enabled flag introduced in commit 7ca29de2136 was not
>> computed correctly. We are interested only in L1's EPT state, not the
>> the combined L0+L1 value.
>>
>> In particular, if L0 uses EPT but L1 does not, nested_ept_enabled must
>> be false to make sure that PDPSTRs are loaded based on CR3 as usual,
>> because the special case described in 26.3.2.4 Loading Page-Directory-
>> Pointer-Table Entries does not apply.
>>
>> Reported-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Adding a standardized "Fixes:" tag even if you mention the commit in
> text allows simpler automated backports to stable kernels,
>
> Fixes: 7ca29de21362 ("KVM: nVMX: fix CR3 load if L2 uses PAE paging and EPT")
>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 98e82ee..a525c72 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -10105,8 +10105,11 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
>>                                 SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
>>                                 SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT);
>>               if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12,
>> -                             CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS))
>> +                             CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS)) {
>>                       exec_control |= vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control;
>> +                     nested_ept_enabled = (vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control &
>> +                                           SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT) != 0;
>
> I'd prefer to get rid of nested_ept_enabled and directly call
> 'nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12)' instead, like the other place in
> prepare_vmcs02() that asks whether we have nested ept.

Oops, I completely missed that. I'll send a v2, thanks!

> The change looks correct,
>
> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
>> +             }
>>
>>               if (exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY) {
>>                       vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0,
>> @@ -10121,8 +10124,6 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
>>                               vmcs12->guest_intr_status);
>>               }
>>
>> -             nested_ept_enabled = (exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT) != 0;
>> -
>>               /*
>>                * Write an illegal value to APIC_ACCESS_ADDR. Later,
>>                * nested_get_vmcs12_pages will either fix it up or
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux