Am 15.03.2017 um 09:27 schrieb Peter Xu:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:45PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> We can easily compact this code and get rid of one local variable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 11 +++--------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
>> index e77e8c3..c50b839 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void pic_unlock(struct kvm_pic *s)
>> __releases(&s->lock)
>> {
>> bool wakeup = s->wakeup_needed;
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, *found = NULL;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> int i;
>>
>> s->wakeup_needed = false;
>> @@ -59,16 +59,11 @@ static void pic_unlock(struct kvm_pic *s)
>> if (wakeup) {
>> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, s->kvm) {
>> if (kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(vcpu)) {
>> - found = vcpu;
>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
>> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>> break;
>
> Maybe "return" directly here? Besides:
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, turned that break into return and added your rb!
--
Thanks,
David
