Hello Xie XiUQi,
On 3/12/2017 8:31 PM, Xie XiuQi wrote:
Hi Baicar Tyler,
On 2017/3/11 2:23, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
Hello Xie XiuQi,
On 3/9/2017 2:41 AM, Xie XiuQi wrote:
On 2017/3/7 4:45, Tyler Baicar wrote:
Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
will know when they occur. These trace events are
consistent with the ARM processor error section type
defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 1 +
drivers/ras/ras.c | 1 +
include/ras/ras_event.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 5861b6f..b36db48 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -162,6 +162,40 @@
);
/*
+ * ARM Processor Events Report
+ *
+ * This event is generated when hardware detects an ARM processor error
+ * has occurred. UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(arm_event,
+
+ TP_PROTO(const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(proc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u64, mpidr)
+ __field(u64, midr)
+ __field(u32, running_state)
+ __field(u32, psci_state)
+ __field(u8, affinity)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->affinity = proc->affinity_level;
+ __entry->mpidr = proc->mpidr;
+ __entry->midr = proc->midr;
+ __entry->running_state = proc->running_state;
+ __entry->psci_state = proc->psci_state;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("affinity level: %d; MPIDR: %016llx; MIDR: %016llx; "
+ "running state: %d; PSCI state: %d",
+ __entry->affinity, __entry->mpidr, __entry->midr,
+ __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
+);
+
I think these fields are not enough, we need also export arm processor error
information (UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.1), or at least the error type,
address, etc. So that the userspace (such as rasdaemon tool) could know what
error occurred.
This is something I am planning on adding in later. It is not clear to me how to
actually do this at this point. If you look at the spec, there is not a single
error information structure. There is at least one, but possibly a lot. There is
also an unknown amount of context information structures. In "Table 260. ARM Processor
Error Section" there are ERR_INFO_NUM and CONTEXT_INFO_NUM which give the number of these
structures. I think there will need to be separate trace events added in for each of
these structures because I don't think there is a way to have variable amounts of
structures inside of a trace event.
Yes, I agree.
Additional, cper_sec_proc_arm has validation bit, which indicates whether or not each of
the fields is valid in this section. How could we show it in this trace event? If the filed
is invalid, we would get a wrong value here.
I will add in checks for whether the fields are valid similar to what
you did for the error info patch.
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
