On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:39:06PM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote: > ction will be re-executed. > >> > >> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but > >> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back. > >> > > Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception > > generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This > > function does not handle IRQ so no problem there. > > But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM. > Why not do that a little bit later? > > BTW, this issue exist in original code as well. > Yes, but I've already sent a patch to fix this in existing code. It your patch will fix this to I'll drop my version. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
