Dong, Eddie wrote: > ction will be re-executed. >>> >>> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but >>> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back. >>> >> Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception >> generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This >> function does not handle IRQ so no problem there. > > But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM. > Why not do that a little bit later? > > BTW, this issue exist in original code as well. > > Eddie Actually this is already addressed in current patch too: Just keep the former exception. If you mean the prink should be removed, I am fine. BTW, this case doesn't happen in reality. Thx, eddie-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
