On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:11:57PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:41:50PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:22:14AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:55:01PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > INVALID_PHYS_ADDR is also confusing if we think of index into > > > high-part of 64-bit address. A high-part is apparently valid. > > > > Btw, if this stands, then maybe we can consider drop patch 2, since > > that patch did exactly the thing mentioned here... Thanks, > > Hmm.. that sounds about right. Andrew? yup > > > -- peterx
