2017-02-27 18:19 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On 26/02/2017 09:46, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> L2 fails to boot on a non-APICv box dues to 'commit 0ad3bed6c5ec
>> ("kvm: nVMX: move nested events check to kvm_vcpu_running")'
>>
>> KVM internal error. Suberror: 3
>> extra data[0]: 800000ef
>> extra data[1]: 1
>> RAX=0000000000000000 RBX=ffffffff81f36140 RCX=0000000000000000 RDX=0000000000000000
>> RSI=0000000000000000 RDI=0000000000000000 RBP=ffff88007c92fe90 RSP=ffff88007c92fe90
>> R8 =ffff88007fccdca0 R9 =0000000000000000 R10=00000000fffedb3d R11=0000000000000000
>> R12=0000000000000003 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000 R15=ffff88007c92c000
>> RIP=ffffffff810645e6 RFL=00000246 [---Z-P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>> ES =0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> CS =0010 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00a09b00 DPL=0 CS64 [-RA]
>> SS =0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> DS =0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> FS =0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> GS =0000 ffff88007fcc0000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> LDT=0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
>> TR =0040 ffff88007fcd4200 00002087 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS64-busy
>> GDT= ffff88007fcc9000 0000007f
>> IDT= ffffffffff578000 00000fff
>> CR0=80050033 CR2=00000000ffffffff CR3=0000000001e0a000 CR4=003406e0
>> DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000
>> DR6=00000000fffe0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
>> EFER=0000000000000d01
>>
>> We should try to reinject previous events if any before trying to inject
>> new event if pending. If vmexit is triggered by L2 guest and L0 interested
>> in, we should reinject IDT-vectoring info to L2 through vmcs02 if any,
>> otherwise, we can consider new IRQs/NMIs which can be injected and call
>> nested events callback to switch from L2 to L1 if needed and inject the
>> proper vmexit events. However, 'commit 0ad3bed6c5ec ("kvm: nVMX: move
>> nested events check to kvm_vcpu_running")' results in the handle events
>> order reversely on non-APICv box. This patch fixes it by checking nested
>> events if there is no KVM_REQ_EVENT since APICv interrupt injection doesn't
>> use KVM_REQ_EVENT any more.
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I need to understand this better. I would hope that something like
>
> @@ -10668,7 +10598,8 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr)
>
> if ((kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) || external_intr) &&
> nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu)) {
> - if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
> + if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
> + vcpu->arch.interrupt.pending)
> return -EBUSY;
> nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT, 0, 0);
> return 0;
>
This is insufficient, L2 guest boot with some mitigation, but very
slowly and finally stuck will the same crash as above. How about
something like below:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index ef4ba71..d46af65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -10642,6 +10642,11 @@ static int vmx_check_nested_events(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool external_intr)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending ||
+ vcpu->arch.nmi_injected ||
+ vcpu->arch.interrupt.pending)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
if (nested_cpu_has_preemption_timer(get_vmcs12(vcpu)) &&
vmx->nested.preemption_timer_expired) {
if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
