On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:24:23AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote: > Emulate GICH interface accesses from the guest hypervisor. > > Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 + > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.c > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > index 9c35e9a..8573faf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > @@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o > > kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_NESTED_HYP) += handle_exit_nested.o > kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_NESTED_HYP) += emulate-nested.o > +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_NESTED_HYP) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.o > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b13128e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2-nested.c > @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ > +#include <linux/cpu.h> > +#include <linux/kvm.h> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h> > + > +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h> > + > +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> > +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h> > +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > +#include <kvm/arm_vgic.h> > + > +#include "vgic.h" > +#include "vgic-mmio.h" > + > +static inline struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *vcpu_nested_if(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.nested_vgic_v2; > +} > + > +static inline struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *vcpu_shadow_if(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.shadow_vgic_v2; > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_vtr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + u32 reg; > + > + reg = kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr - 1; > + reg |= 0b100 << 26; > + reg |= 0b100 << 29; Pure magic? Can we have some defines? Have you checked the existing header file if we have some defines for this? > + > + return reg; > +} > + > +static inline bool lr_triggers_eoi(u32 lr) > +{ > + return !(lr & (GICH_LR_STATE | GICH_LR_HW)) && (lr & GICH_LR_EOI); > +} > + > +static unsigned long get_eisr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool upper_reg) > +{ > + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = vcpu_nested_if(vcpu); > + int max_lr = upper_reg ? 64 : 32; > + int min_lr = upper_reg ? 32 : 0; > + int nr_lr = min(kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr, max_lr); > + int i; > + u32 reg = 0; So the assumption here is that we can only emualte a virtual GICH interface with the same number of LRs that the hardware has, yes ? Can you document this assumption in the commit message and explain how we deal with nr_lr for all this logic based on that. Seems like this could go in the commit message. > + > + for (i = min_lr; i < nr_lr; i++) { > + if (lr_triggers_eoi(cpu_if->vgic_lr[i])) > + reg |= BIT(i - min_lr); > + } > + > + return reg; > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + return get_eisr(vcpu, false); > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + return get_eisr(vcpu, true); > +} > + > +static u32 get_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool upper_reg) > +{ > + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = vcpu_nested_if(vcpu); > + int max_lr = upper_reg ? 64 : 32; > + int min_lr = upper_reg ? 32 : 0; > + int nr_lr = min(kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr, max_lr); > + u32 reg = 0; > + int i; > + > + for (i = min_lr; i < nr_lr; i++) { > + if (!(cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] & GICH_LR_STATE)) > + reg |= BIT(i - min_lr); > + } > + > + return reg; > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + return get_elrsr(vcpu, false); > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + return get_elrsr(vcpu, true); > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_misr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = vcpu_nested_if(vcpu); > + int nr_lr = kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr; > + u32 reg = 0; > + > + if (vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr0(vcpu, addr, len) || > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr1(vcpu, addr, len)) > + reg |= GICH_MISR_EOI; > + > + if (cpu_if->vgic_hcr & GICH_HCR_UIE) { > + u32 elrsr0 = vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr0(vcpu, addr, len); > + u32 elrsr1 = vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr1(vcpu, addr, len); > + int used_lrs; > + > + used_lrs = nr_lr - (hweight32(elrsr0) + hweight32(elrsr1)); > + if (used_lrs <= 1) > + reg |= GICH_MISR_U; > + } > + > + /* TODO: Support remaining bits in this register */ Is this going to happen in this series? Why don't we just do it here? > + return reg; > +} > + > +static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v2_gich(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) > +{ > + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = vcpu_nested_if(vcpu); > + u32 value; > + > + switch (addr & 0xfff) { > + case GICH_HCR: > + value = cpu_if->vgic_hcr; > + break; > + case GICH_VMCR: > + value = cpu_if->vgic_vmcr; > + break; > + case GICH_APR: > + value = cpu_if->vgic_apr; > + break; > + case GICH_LR0 ... (GICH_LR0 + 4 * (VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS - 1)): > + value = cpu_if->vgic_lr[(addr & 0xff) >> 2]; > + break; > + default: > + return 0; > + } > + > + return value; > +} > + > +static void vgic_mmio_write_v2_gich(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len, > + unsigned long val) > +{ > + struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = vcpu_nested_if(vcpu); > + > + switch (addr & 0xfff) { > + case GICH_HCR: > + cpu_if->vgic_hcr = val; > + break; > + case GICH_VMCR: > + cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = val; > + break; > + case GICH_APR: > + cpu_if->vgic_apr = val; > + break; > + case GICH_LR0 ... (GICH_LR0 + 4 * (VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS - 1)): > + cpu_if->vgic_lr[(addr & 0xff) >> 2] = val; Don't you need to check if we actually support this particular LR ? > + break; > + } > +} > + > +static const struct vgic_register_region vgic_v2_gich_registers[] = { > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_HCR, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_gich, vgic_mmio_write_v2_gich, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_VTR, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_vtr, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_VMCR, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_gich, vgic_mmio_write_v2_gich, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_MISR, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_misr, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_EISR0, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr0, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_EISR1, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_eisr1, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_ELRSR0, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr0, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_ELRSR1, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_elrsr1, vgic_mmio_write_wi, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_APR, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_gich, vgic_mmio_write_v2_gich, 4, > + VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > + REGISTER_DESC_WITH_LENGTH(GICH_LR0, > + vgic_mmio_read_v2_gich, vgic_mmio_write_v2_gich, > + 4 * VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS, VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), > +}; > -- > 1.9.1 > >