On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 12:39 -0700, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > On 2/21/2017 12:10 PM, James Morse wrote: > > Nit: please use the "%s""section... that this file consistently uses. This means > > this code will still work as expected when someone adds '%ss' support to printk! Huh? How would that work?
