Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright wrote:
* Gregory Haskins (ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
* Avi Kivity (avi@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Cool,  I will code this up and submit it.  While Im at it, Ill run it
through the "nullio" ringer, too. ;)  It would be cool to see the
pv-mmio hit that 2.07us number.  I can't think of any reason why this
will not be the case.
Don't - it's broken. It will also catch device assignment mmio and hypercall them.
Not necessarily.  It just needs to be creative w/ IO_COND
Hi Chris,
   Could you elaborate?  How would you know which pages to hypercall and
which to let PF?

Was just thinking of some ugly mangling of the addr (I'm not entirely
sure what would work best).

I think we just past the "too complicated" threshold.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux