Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:04:49 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20170207215217.GG31091@potion>
References: <1482164232-130035-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <ebb76f1c-055e-504f-5a4d-35f2ed93e6d0@redhat.com> <20170207215217.GG31091@potion>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1


On 07/02/2017 22:52, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> there might be some rough
> edges with nested, but it was broken even before, and they fix at least
> one known bug.

I don't think so, nested IRQ injection is tested very well.  Why do you
say it was broken even before?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
  - From: Radim Krčmář

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
  - From: Radim Krčmář

Prev by Date: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix compilation
Next by Date: [RFC PATCH] KVM: race-free exit from KVM_RUN without POSIX signals
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux