Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:02:43PM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:52:31AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: >> >> > Refactor the KVM code to use the __tlbi macros, which will allow an errata >> >> > workaround that repeats tlbi dsb sequences to only change one location. >> >> > This is not intended to change the generated assembly and comparing before >> >> > and after vmlinux objdump shows no functional changes. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Thanks, I'll queue this one via arm64. >> >> I just noticed this patch but there's been a similar patch from Mark >> that I've been carrying as part of the KVM TLB monitoring series[0]. >> >> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg09359.html > > Well I've already queued the one from Christopher. It's weird that Mark's > version appears to miss the local VMID case (but it does have the > flush_icache_all I wanted :). > > Anyway, I'm not reverting anything, so you'll need to rebase when this > lot lands in mainline. Sure. I'll drop the patch the next time around. The patch is unrelated to that series and should've gone in when we introduced the __tlbi() macro but got left out somehow. > > Will > _______________________________________________ > kvmarm mailing list > kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
