Re: timerfd & vmexit poor performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 January 2017 at 20:51, David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Don.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Don Bowman <db@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The below C program, run on my host, uses ~0% of the host CPU when run
>> with 100000 (e.g. wake up every 100us).
>>
>> When run under kvm, this uses ~100% of the processor. The reason is there
>> is a vmexit for every timer wakeup.
>
> This is probably halt-polling. When a vCPU halts, KVM will sometimes
> spin until a virtual interrupt arrives to wake up the vCPU. This gives
> better wake-up latency, but at the cost of CPU usage. The upside is
> halt-polling only kicks in if the host CPU is otherwise idle. So it
> doesn't steal runtime from other threads.
>

I am very grateful for your answer, this was hugely helpful.
yes indeed this improved. I'll have to read and understand a bit
more the tradeoff.

But thanks very much!



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux