Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > >> I think we are ok in this regard (at least in v5) without the callback. >> kvm holds irqfd, which holds eventfd. In a normal situation, we will >> have eventfd with 2 references. If userspace closes the eventfd, it >> will drop 1 of the 2 eventfd file references, but the object should >> remain intact as long as kvm still holds it as well. When the kvm-fd is >> released, we will then decouple from the eventfd->wqh and drop the last >> fput(), officially freeing it. >> >> Likewise, if kvm is closed before the eventfd, we will simply decouple >> from the wqh and fput(eventfd), leaving the last reference held by >> userspace until it closes as well. >> >> Let me know if you see any holes in that. >> > > Looks OK, modulo my knowledge of KVM internals. > Thanks Davide, If there isn't any more feedback on the series from Al, Avi, etc...please formally submit your eventfd patch so this series is available for Avi to pull in for inclusion when/if he deems it fit. Thanks again, -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
