On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:10:05PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The check in kvm_set_pic_irq() and kvm_set_ioapic_irq() was just a
> temporary measure until the code improved enough for us to do this.
>
> This changes APIC in a case when KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING is called to set up pic
> and ioapic routes before KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP. Those rules would get overwritten
> by KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP at best, so it is pointless to allow it. Userspaces
> hopefully noticed that things don't work if they do that and don't do that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Since we are at here, do we need to protect KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING in
general as well to make sure kernel APIC is there? Like:
---------8<---------
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 482612b..31141a7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3057,6 +3057,10 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries = NULL;
r = -EFAULT;
+
+ if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
+ goto out;
+
if (copy_from_user(&routing, argp, sizeof(routing)))
goto out;
r = -EINVAL;
--------->8---------
Thanks,
-- peterx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
